I think I found a bug in Test::More, but before I file it in
the request tracker, I wanted to confirm with you.
ARGH! I hate getting mail like this. People are trying to be nice but they're actually making my life harder. When the bug comes to me directly I have to deal with it immediately rather than run the risk of it sinking to the murky, fossilized depths of my inbox. Or I have to enter the bug into RT myself taking up more time. Any discussion we have is lost to the ether.
Why do people do this? The only thing I can figure is that there's some perceived stigma associated with "officially" reporting a bug for all to see. Let me make it clear, there is no stigma associated with reporting a bug via rt.cpan.org! You're not accusing me of writing shoddy software. I don't care what my public bug count is. And if its not a bug I'll just reply and resolve it. If it is a bug its in the system, it won't get lost, and we have a nice log of the conversation. It makes my life easier.
Use the request tracker. That's what its there for, to track requests so I don't have to.
Bounce (Score:2)
Re:Bounce (Score:2)
I've been bouncing direct mail to perl5-porters for a while. Sod ettiquette - if someone is not able to read the fine manual on where to report problems, I'm going to take direct action. I've also changed my public e-mail address on PAUSE to
nwc10+please+use+perlbug+for+perl+queries@colon.colondot.net(and yes, that is a valid address that works, although MBM's MTA is deliberately very very picky and reasons it gives for bouncing mail are probably valid). acme said that he used to get a lot of private mailRe:Bounce (Score:2)
Re:Bounce (Score:2)
seen rgs (Score:2)
Tell them how to report bugs in the docs (Score:2)
The Test::More documentation that I have doesn't tell the user to report bugs to RT. Indeed, it uses your pobox address inste
Re:Tell them how to report bugs in the docs (Score:2)
But yes, I should probably mention it in some form in the docs. However, in this case, the reporter deliberately side-stepped RT though it turns out there were ulterior motives.
A-feared of being wrong? (Score:1)
Re:A-feared of being wrong? (Score:1)
> I imagine some people are afraid to have their own misunderstanding officialy logged for eveyone to see and giggle at.
>
I think this is significant. In my own department I introduced RT for sys admin support requests. Another closely associated department liked it, but also wanted to have all comments and replies cc-ed to the mailing list that everyone was on.
The result was that staff stopped using it on their own unless directed by management to submit a ticket. Management continued to use