All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
use Perl Log In
gnat (29)
gnat
(email not shown publicly)
(email not shown publicly)
Monday June 09, 2003
07:16 PM
Finding Nemo (no spoilers)
9/10. Better than Monsters, Inc. Highly recommended.
--Nat
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
but computer language design is just like a stroll in the park.
Jurassic Park, that is.
--Larry Wall in <1994Jun15.074039.2654@netlabs.com>
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Better Than MI? (Score:2)
I liked it, too (we went opening night), thoroughly enjoyable. But better than Monsters, Inc.? I'm not so sure about that. It's a close call, though.
--David
Re:Better Than MI? (Score:2, Informative)
Definately more . . . frenetic; seemed to be more action-y sequences, whereas M, Inc had the door warehouse scene and that was about it.
And probably better for a slightly older crowd. My at the time 2 year old wasn't really bothered by M, Inc aside from thinking Randal was in the closet at the grandparents house, but a stuffed Sulley solved that (wait a minute . . . that's sheer marketing genius). Half way through Nemo he (now 3) was wanting to go home. Mainly it was the sharks he didn't like, so I