I recently needed to write a series of codes on lambda calculus in perl. As MJD has shown Perl 5 can handle lambda calculus but I am beginning to get tired of whole bunch of 'my $x = shift' needed.
our $ZERO = sub { my $f = shift; sub { my $x = shift; $x }}; our $SUCC = sub { my $n = shift; sub { my $f = shift; sub { my $x = shift; $f->($n->($f)($x)) }}}; our $ADD = sub{ my $m = shift; sub { my $n = shift; sub { my $f = shift; sub { my $x = shift; $m->($f)($n->($f)($x)) }}}}; our $MULT = sub { my $m = shift; sub { my $n = shift; sub { my $f = shift; $m->($n->($f)) }}}; our $POW = sub { my $m = shift; sub { my $n = shift; $n->($m) }};
And I found that these can be made much, much simpler and more intuitive with Perl 6, even more so than scheme!
You can even make it simpler by removing dots but I leave it that way because it looks more like the original notation that way (i.e. zero:= λf.λx.x).
Runs perfectly fine on Pugs 6.2.8. Add the code below and see it for yourself.
my $one = $SUCC.($ZERO); my $two = $SUCC.($one); my $four = $ADD.($two)($two); my $eight = $MULT.($two)($four); my $sixteen = $POW.($four)($two); for($one, $two, $four, $eight, $sixteen) -> $n { $n.(sub($i){ 1 + $i})(0).say };
Maybe we can use this for advocacy.
Dan the Perl 6 User Now
P.S. I am surprised to find Pugs does not include this kind of sample scripts.