All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
use Perl Log In
chaoticset (2105)
chaoticset
(email not shown publicly)
http://chaoticset.perlmonk.org/
AOL IM: chaoticset23 (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: illuminatus_foil (Add User, Send Message)
JAPH. (That's right -- I'm not Really Inexperienced any more.)
I'm not just here, I'm here [perlmonks.org], and here [javajunkies.org] too, I ramble randomly in my philosophical blog [blogspot.com] and my other blog [blogspot.com]. Soon I'll come in a convenient six-pack.
(email not shown publicly)
http://chaoticset.perlmonk.org/
AOL IM: chaoticset23 (Add Buddy, Send Message)
Yahoo! ID: illuminatus_foil (Add User, Send Message)
JAPH. (That's right -- I'm not Really Inexperienced any more.)
I'm not just here, I'm here [perlmonks.org], and here [javajunkies.org] too, I ramble randomly in my philosophical blog [blogspot.com] and my other blog [blogspot.com]. Soon I'll come in a convenient six-pack.
Journal of chaoticset (2105)
Thursday June 12, 2003
09:23 PM
Can You Say Site Update?
Yeah, that's right -- my site has gone from crappy to merely awkward.
It's a start. I need to have something in place that demonstrates some ability to design, even if I don't have a clear notion of what I can do next to create something database-driven. (Which is the next step -- demonstrate that I can write something database-driven.)
Anyway, reviews of the colorscheme/layout/text/etc. are welcome. (And, should I get just a little more ambitious, I'll take petdance's advice on website reviews and run a few tests on it all myself.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
a perl construct is related to its length. On the other hand, I'm
perfectly capable of changing my mind next week... :-) --lwall
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Validate it (Score:2)
Maybe a good idea to show that you can conform to the relevant standards. There's a good validator here [w3.org]. As you'll see it has some issues with your site as it stands.