[ comments enabled ]
Rules:
* the module's first released version had to have been uploaded to CPAN last year. If it was on CPAN prior to January 1, it does not count.
* nominations must be made in reply to this journal entry
* the winning module and nominator will get some sort of cool prize and something in The Perl Review .
* Andy Lester's modules are eligible, but mine, which are not cool anyway, are not.
* Acme:: modules are eligible.
Why me? (Score:2)
--
xoa
Re:Why me? (Score:1)
2 Nominees (Score:2)
I'd like to nominate XML::SAX::Machines [cpan.org] and DBD::SQLite [cpan.org].
mirod
vote (Score:1)
"Perl Archive Toolkit"
http://search.cpan.org/author/AUTRIJUS/PAR-0.61/ [cpan.org]
regards,
My Choice... (Score:2)
Tough Crowd (Score:1)
PAR impresses me -- really really impresses me -- and Module::Signature has been much needed. I'll guess that anything Autrijus puts out is worth mentioning. Still, I immodestly use Test::MockObject [cpan.org]more than any other module written in the last year. Make my life easier by disallowing author nominations. :)
DBD::SQLite (Score:1)