There is a growing amount of material available about automated testing in the perl community. I have noticed that often times when an engineer reads an article
| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mountain out of a molehill | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Linux Journal is offensive; Perl deserves better | ||||||
| jobs-discuss | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Shopping around for a new gig | ||||||
| hiring | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: No longer a programmer | ||||||
| Thanks | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Emacs: shell - ansi-term | ||||||
| Thanks | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: TPF grant | ||||||
| Thanks | ||||||
| attached to Crypt-SSLeay under new management | ||||||
| I'm in your boat | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: How to rid yourself of a user base | ||||||
| Thank you! | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: YAPC::NA 2006 videos online | ||||||
| truly awesome | ||||||
| attached to Journal Discussion: Heading towards PPI 1.200, featuring new features! | ||||||
| Logged in users can choose whether or not they'd like comments shown grouped by discussion on their comment settings page | ||||||