It's Friday, I'm entitled to bitch.
There are certain word confusion mistakes that bug me to no end. I just saw one in an LWN article, where the author wrote, "for all intensive purposes". It's "for all intents and purposes"; if you're going to write cliches, at least get them right! They may sound similar, but what the heck is an "intensive purpose"?
Other favorites:
Grumble, grumble.
well, you aren't alone (Score:1)
andrew
Prairie Dog Weirdness (Score:2, Funny)
I heard a strange story on NPR last night about an exotic animals pet store that's sold prairie dogs that may have monkeypox. The interviewer asked the owner, "Have you had any returns?" That's a very specific question.
The owner replied, "We had one customer return a prairie dog". That's a very specific answer, with one very specific customer in mind. She continued, "They had some questions about their..." at which point I started lamenting the state of English usage in this country.
Subject/pronoun
Re:Prairie Dog Weirdness (Score:2)
True (Score:2, Funny)
That would work. You should still feel guilty for spoiling a perfectly good rant, though.
Re:Prairie Dog Weirdness (Score:3, Informative)
Singular they has over half a millenium of general acceptance in English literature, having in that time been used to good effect by such luminaries as Geoffrey Chaucer, Edmund Spenser, William Shakespeare, Jonathan Swift, Daniel Defoe, Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, William Makepeace Thackeray, Sir Walter Scott, George Eliot, Charles Dickens, Robert Louis Stevenson, Walt Whitman, George Bernard Shaw, Lewis Carroll, Oscar Wilde, R