«The lower house of the Missouri legislature has approved a law making it a criminal offence to photograph animals in a barn or any other place housing them for agricultural, business or research purposes. The law, aimed at stopping animal rights activists, carries a one-year jail sentence and a $1,000 fine. AP, Jefferson City »
You'll get my photo albums of livestock mistreatment when you pry them from my cold dead hands!!! Oh wait, I'm thinking of porn and/or guns. Nevermind.
it was likely in response to (Score:2)
All those incriminating photos of Ashcroft giving 'sermons' to the backend of sheep and cows. :)
Warning, link to illegal material below! (Score:2)
I am _SO_ relieved that this picture [axis-of-aevil.net] is now illegal!
mirod
In other news... (Score:1)
Looks like a triple-win for the activists to me
Laws don't kill people, people do. (Score:2)
Once again, a perfect example of a case where existing laws are just fine and already solve the problem if enforced. If that animal rights activist is causing trouble in your barn get him for trespassing, not taking photos. Trespassing is illegal in Missouri, right?
This is clearly an unconstitutional abridgment of freedom of the press. I come down firmly on the side of the animal rights activists against this law, though I'm by no means an animal rights activist. [I like animals, though. They're quit
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Pea-brained legislators (Score:1)
Now, it sounds like a pretty silly law... but HOW FUCKING ILLITERATE does one have to be to get elected in Missouri?
"within a structure that an animal is housed"???
Seems to me that a "correct" parse of t