I'm glad I raised the modules@perl.org issue. I think it's elevated an issue for new module writers to the front. I hope it didn't offend anyone who works on the list to raise the issue. I just raised it because there's been a number of times I've been asked what to name a module, and so I'm guessing that people are going elsewhere...
Anyway, I think the RT idea is a good one. That combined with *some* ad-hoc queries in places like use.perl and perlmonks should help ease the burden on the modules@perl.org list, and also help streamline the whole process.
modules@ (Score:1)
There could be a section/topic on use Perl for people to ask questions about modules, too.
Re:modules@ (Score:1)
I read that list through the newsserver, not the mailing list, and I think that we should advertise it instead of finding alternatives to it.
We already have News and mail to post / read there, why forking (or creating a third alternative) on use.perl?
-- Godoy.
Re:modules@ (Score:1)
Re:modules@ (Score:1)
Really, having something here sporadically is OK, but making it permanent? I don't know.
BTW, I think I should have written that at the submitted story, not here on Matts' diary.
-- Godoy.