Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:1)

by jmcnamara (659)

Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org

The first name is without a doubt Italian but the second seems to be Spanish.

Perhaps it isn't a conspiracy. Perhaps they voted in reaction to Randal's vote.

I think that a one star rating on all the modules was unfair. They should have been rated on their usefulness, implementation or efficacy. Instead they were downrated to make a point. That was unworthy.

John.
--
- Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:2)
  
  by merlyn (47)
  They're also highly unmaintainable, because they use a style of indentation that truly is a mistake.
  However, if I could find a way to simply delete my 1-star ratings (which apply only to an outdated version), I would. I have not found any way to do that though.
  I think arbitrary five-star ratings are clearly an abuse of the system though.
  --
  
  Randal L. Schwartz
  
  Stonehenge
  - Re: Having fun with cpanratings.perl.org (Score:1)
    
    by beppu (899) on 2004.10.11 13:25 (#35106) Homepage Journal
    
    If we're going to be anal about indentation, we might as well be coding in Python. I also took some time to look at his code, and while it may look unusual, it does not look sloppy. Why do you have to be so mean?
    
    Reply to This
    
    Parent

Get More Comments

Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.