Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • The difference is that at the gambling casino, there are 2 assumptions. One is that the users are fools and losers and the other is that the organization is crooked and on the take.

    • The casino assume that it itself is on the take? Huh? Did you even read this article or did you just drive by paste your comments on? I talked at length about how the electronic games were repeatedly broken by customers and that only through good auditing are these attacks found. So I'm not sure where you got the idea that they assume that the patrons are "fools and losers". They *hope* they are, but certainly don't assume it. But, supposing that you were correct, what does this have to do with the analogy between e.voting and electronic gaming? Are you trying to make the point that Diebold doesn't assume its users are fools and losers? And what significance is that anyway?

      Nevermind. I don't want to know...

      In the future, when (and if) commenting on my blog, please demonstrate an understanding of the text you're commenting on. If you have an out of context remark to make, do it on your own blog.

      -scott