NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
i don't think (Score:2)
you are being completely unbiased when you say that there isn't a clique. There are many. Saying that's it's one big happy meritocracy is like saying the US is one big happy democracy.
Re:i don't think (Score:2)
If there are cliques, they're still relatively easy to get into. It seems to me that it's a damn sight easier to make your way into the upper echelons of Perl than in any business of the same size.
And while a CEO-sized paycheck of respect won't pay the bills, it can make your 9-5 grind a little more bearable. Mr Jark doesn't get paid for his hard work on Perl, but we respect him greatly for it. He's a big fish in this pond, and it must be vaguely comforting to know that even when things get unpleasant at work, there are thousands of people who appreciate and applaud his Perl work because he does a great job at it.
Ugh, I hope I'm not sounding like ESR here :-)
--Nat
Reply to This
Parent
Re:i don't think (Score:2)
Yes, some of the Exalted Inner Realms are a lot easier to get into on sheer merit than they used to be, but there's more to perl than those.
Re:i don't think (Score:2)
Indeed. It has nothing to do with how many people name their children after Jarkko or how they gush over the amount of time he spends on perl...rather a general observation of human behaviour in a lot of different places. It's not unique to Perl but I just wanted to make the point that it would be a mistake to think that somehow the people of perl have managed to transcend earthly human behavioural patterns. It's not always a bad thing but they do exist. Being female in a 98% male crowd may also give me a
Re:i don't think (Score:2)
As for your technical contributions ... you're just a sysadmin, right? :-)
Re:i don't think (Score:1)
Re:i don't think (Score:2)
I believe we met when you were the ass grabber mr. torkington :) Gone are those days replaced by the prim image of pious family man *sigh*
And, no worries, I am a decidedly cheap and goofy drunk but it does seem to get far more press than it deserves. We usually see only what we want to see or hear only what we want to hear so I made the example personal since I am no more immune to that than anyone else and it was the most fresh on the stack. It has less to do with affection rather how we interact without
Re:i don't think (Score:1)
A nice thing about #perl is that while you are respected for what you do, you are also respected for who you are. You can hang out and do nothing, or almost nothing, for "the Perl community" but still be respected by many, just
Re:i don't think (Score:1)
Re:i don't think (Score:1)
Nat, it's a beautiful community. I've never found anything but acceptable, although it was an honest acceptance that told me when I was passing bad ideas.
My first brush with the Perl culture was reading the files in the Perl distribution. Seriously. That documentation was magnetic; it made me want to get out there and contribute. And even though I haven't done much (yet), what little I've done has never made me feel there was a clique that didn't want me.
Heck, I jotted off a message to Larry Wall one
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Re:i don't think (Score:1)
acceptance, not acceptable.
always click preview, not submit.
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers