NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
You can't even think about them!"
--Larry Wall in Configure from the perl distribution
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Is it any good though? (Score:2)
I saw a link to this last week but have not tried it yet. Only work forces me to use Windows, my own boxes are all Linux so it's something I only need a little.
-- "It's not magic, it's work..."
Re: (Score:1)
Seemed to work just fine for me. I haven’t used it enough to give a qualified evaluation though. I’m in the same boat: I don’t need it much.
Re: (Score:2)
Fair enough. I suppose it's worth a try then. Are you running the free or the compulsory-donationware version?
-- "It's not magic, it's work..."
Re: (Score:1)
Just the free.
Cygwin/X has lapsed? (Score:2)
What do they mean that work on Cygwin/X has lapsed?
I use Cygwin extensively, including X. Seems like Xming wouldn't work so well for me because I also need all the UNIX tools locally. (Although I guess I could just set up a box for that purpose, but at home I want it all on my laptop.) I update Cygwin's packages frequently. Is nobody maintaining the Cygwin X packages?
J. David works really hard, has a passion for writing good software, and knows many of the world's best Perl programmers
Re: (Score:1)
What do I know? I have no idea whatsoever.
Cygwin’s terrible path mapping breaks my brain, though. I hate it with a passion. I much prefer to simply run Unix tools directly under Windows, so I use GnuWin32 for the Unix toolkit and generally standalone whenever available, preferrably native free software where it makes sense, eg. PuTTY.
Hence Xming rather than Cygwin/X.
If you’re happy with Cygwin, I’m not gonna care – more’s the better for you.