Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • It's a common fallacy that "singular" and "plural" are absolute concepts. Grammarians always assert that they are, and there's no harm in insisting on on "is" in "The first of five prototypes {is|are} scheduled to fly next year." But frankly, I find that there's usually vastly more important things to worry about, in any piece of writing, than the case where a heavy NP subject ending with a plural NP throws the verb into plural (or fails to force singularness on the verb, depending on your model of things
    • by jdporter (36) on 2002.06.18 9:40 (#9665) Homepage Journal
      The problem you illustrated is purely one of semantics. That's a whole nother (:-) level, which I am going to avoid. Clearly, for the purposes of communication, one should tolerate some degree of bad syntax if that's the price for semantic clarity.