NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Different tactic (Score:2)
Bouncing hasn't worked. Period.
Now we're trying to remove the economy of spam, by making sure the user never sees the spam. I think hitting the Spammers in the wallet is the only place they're going to take any notice.
Re:Different tactic (Score:1)
The problem with the anti-spam software is it's actually taken away some of the disincentives that mail admins used to use. When AOL blacklists your IP address, none of your spam gets through and you notice that. When 90% of AOL users kick in anti-spam filters that means that 10% will not, and who cares that 90% of the work is wasted? These guys brag about million-message an hour delivery capabilities. Each one's so cheap that the silently tossed ones are irrelevant, especially as these weasels are looking at 0.0015% response rates anyway. Mail caught by spam filters is lost in the noise of mail deleted as spam anyway.
Do I like and use anti-spam software? Heck yes. But using it has, ultimately, increased the spam load on my server rather than decreased it, which is why I want a bigger solution.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Different tactic (Score:2)
I don't recommend this to everyone, as some people have mail that SpamAssassin scores rather highly, but for regular geeks it's probably a good idea.
I do feel sympathy though. I know exactly what you mean. But I don't really have a solution yet.