NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Re: Browser based testing of your own code (Score:1)
The heyday of Konqueror is over. Wouldn't you rather test with Webkit based browsers? http://seleniumhq.org/docs/01_introducing_selenium.html#supported-browsers [seleniumhq.org]
That's not enough at all. Dump of an Opera 10 application window that has loaded one document with a complex HTML form:
Now guess which is what.
Yes, but not in the complicated prone-to-fail way you think. Applications shall provide accessibility hooks. http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/ [freedesktop.org] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Active_Accessibility [wikipedia.org] http://www.apple.com/accessibility/macosx/ [apple.com]
Drivers such as accessibility aides or in our case testing frameworks then can interpret and manipulate any application elements (widgets, stuff on canvases or rendered areas) directly.
Already done. Save yourself the trouble of re-inventing. http://google.com/search?q=mozrepl [google.com] http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize-FireFox [cpan.org]
Reply to This
Re: (Score:1)
I made a mistake there, should have been
-treeinstead of-children. The argument still stands – the descendant windows have neither type nor name.