NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Fix It! (Score:1)
The source code for the site is available. Commit access is easy to get. If you have a better design, nothing stands in the way of your improvements.
Re: (Score:1)
About ten years of lost progress stand in the way of improvements. Need I list the number of programming languages that came and went in that time?
Thankfully I am not paying for any of the group developing perl 6, I would be pretty annoyed if that were the case.
I can fix the webpage, sure. I cannot, however, fix the last 10 years of perl 6 debacle.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you really meaning to imply that there has been no progress on Perl (5 or 6) for the last ten years?
Yes, I think that would be very useful to me.
Pm
Re: (Score:1)
I'm not implying, I'm saying that perl 6 is to perl what "heaven's gate" was to Michael Cimino's directorial career.
Perl 5 is great, but the sheer amount of resources that have been put into vapourwareperl6 is mind-boggling. And *please* don't point me to some project saying "you can use it now" because you *know* perl 6 is not production quality.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
How in the world would you have possibly finished Perl 6 eight years ago, with the resources available eight years ago, the volunteer effort available eight years ago, and the knowledge of Perl 6 available eight years ago?
How long should it take to invent a lexically overrideable, self-hosting grammar engine and build a complete, coherent, consistent language around that? If you're doing that in 2001, you don't have the advantage of hindsight and h
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Fix It! (Score:2)
But then it wouldn't have been what Larry wanted for Perl 6.
--
xoa
Reply to This
Parent