NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Which win32 perl flavor? More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Strawberry (Score:1)

by jk2addict (4946)

Definitely better than AS. Compile environment included. No futzing w/PPM and VC/.NET1/NET2 libs and compilers.
- Re: (Score:1)
  
  by DAxelrod (4649)
  
  The only thing that scared me off Strawberry was "An alpha release of Strawberry Perl is under development". How stable is it?
  - Re:Strawberry (Score:1)
    
    by Aristotle (5147) <pagaltzis@gmx.de> on 2006.10.06 11:50 (#50834) Homepage Journal
    
    I haven’t tried to run production with it – but then, we’re talking about Windows, so damned if I’d try anyway. For what I need (light development work, once in a while), it’s been completely reliable, and certainly has proven much nicer when trying to get exotic modules working than AS Perl ever even came close to.
    
    Reply to This
    
    Parent

Get More Comments

Reply

Disclaimer: I work at the reg*.{[hc],sym} like a novice alchemist:
I pour the blue liquid on the red liquid. If it doesn't blow up on my
face, I proceed to turn up the flame under the blue liquid, and so on.
I have very little idea of what I am really doing, I just like the
pretty colors :-)
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Navigation

Which win32 perl flavor? 3 Comments More | Login | Reply /

Please Log In to Continue

Strawberry (Score:1)

Re: (Score:1)

Re:Strawberry (Score:1)