Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Didn't We Use The Phrase "Reverse Sublimation" a While Ago? 2 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • ... is a reality check! The way you think people perceive the Perl6 development just isn't the way the world works. Scientifically everything's going well and correct but it will never work with the people you want to persuade that Perl6 is coming along nicely and is a thing to watch. Please stop bashing people for criticizing the Perl6 development, chromatic! I understand that you're putting your heart and soul and a lot of work in it but criticism still is a good thing and in the case of Perl6 it's really

    • Please stop bashing people for criticizing the [Perl 6] development, chromatic!

      What do you suggest I do with people who haven't done their research and feel the need to bloviate their uninformed opinions all over the Internet on subjects I work on and care about, besides responding with verifiable facts?

      If any of the statistics I posted are wrong, I welcome corrections. If any of the conclusions I've suggested from those statistics are wrong, let's talk about them.

      For anyone to say "Perl 6 does not exist!" requires a strong anti-reality bias against tremendous amounts of public information.

Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.