NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
interesting (Score:1)
Are these entries interesting? (Score:2)
Yes.
And the longer answer - thanks for plugging away at the code, and thanks for describing your findings.
Keep 'em coming (Score:2)
Here's another ++ from me.
And didn't you say something to me on a mailing list that instead of searching for micro-optimizations that I should be looking at algorithmic improvements ;)
Re: (Score:1)
True... but I haven't found any algorithmic improvements in the past week, and I still believe I can get it faster.
Way more interesting than the math stuff :) (Score:1)
Keep up the good work (Score:1)
Yes Yes (Score:1)
No comment! (Score:1)
Ranting, on the other hand...
(And I, for one, think that 5.5% is a huge gain for one simple optimization).
More interesting then your technology rants (Score:1)
Yup, interesting (Score:2)
And I agree with the above poster - an overall 5.5% speedup is HUGE. If that were on our infrastructure you'd have saved us over a million dollars.
Absolutely (Score:1)
What he said ... (Score:1)
extra concats (Score:1)
Interesting -- apparently PGE is generating these concat statements whenever there is PIR embedded in a rule. For example:
Re: (Score:1)
So, I refactored the code to avoid the concats altogether, and building rakudo's actions.pl file is now 1.6% faster than it was before (44.363 versus 45.095 seconds on my box). Not a huge speedup, but I'm still happie
Re: (Score:1)
Suggestion: more people will see this if you post it to your own journal. :-)
post moar parrot (Score:1)
rjbs
interesting (Score:1)
I strongly prefer these posts to your posts complaining.
Matt
c++ (Score:2)
--
xoa