Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Evaluating open source request systems 2 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.

  • RT (Score:3, Informative)

    by darobin (1316) on 2002.06.13 4:43 (#9513) Homepage Journal

    I haven't looked at Bugzilla in a while, but last time I checked the code wasn't all that pretty. I've also found it more bothersome to use.

    RT on the other hand (and while it has its quirks like all software) is definitely a great choice. If you haven't had a chance to play with rt.cpan.org, I recommend you do. Also, you'll easily get lots of support from people in the community that are using it.

    --

    -- Robin Berjon [berjon.com]

  • RT (Score:4, Informative)

    by Matts (1087) on 2002.06.13 5:20 (#9514) Journal
    I second the recommendation to go for RT. We use Bugzilla for SpamAssassin, and it's the single biggest productivity killer on the project (IMHO). Whereas we use RT for axkit, and all my other CPAN modules, and it kicks ass.
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.