use Perl

• Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)

  by davorg (18)

  2000 [pm.org], 2001 [pm.org], 2002 [pm.org], 2003 [pm.org], 2004 [pm.org], 2005 [pm.org] and 2006 [pm.org].
  • Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)

    by cog (4665)

    Because the point was that both those groups appear to have 0 members :-)
    • Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)

      by n1vux (1492)

      Because the point was that both those groups appear to have 0 members :-)

      And our rather noisy Boston [pm.org] mailing list is shown as having 300 members and 0 posts per day. (And doesn't mention sometimes-social meetings.)

      No poll / census is a perfect reflection of reallity -- the Map is not the territory.

      But yes, it is funny that the last two YAPC::EU's have been run by groups with (reportedly) no members.

      (-: Is this a sign that Barbie+Birmingham.PM should make some (read all) members redundant quickly,

      --
      Bill
      # I had a sig when sigs were cool
      use Sig;
      • Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)

        by cog (4665)

        Barbie+Birmingham.PM [...] if she intends to succeed
        
        Er... is that "she" refering to Barbie or to Birmingham? O:-)
        • Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)

          by barbie (2653) <reversethis-{ku. ... m} {ta} {eibrab}> on 2005.12.15 8:08 (#45172) Homepage Journal

          I was wondering that too ;^)

          Reply to This

          Parent

          • Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)

            by n1vux (1492)

            Sorry, yes, to be gramatically correct I should have put brackets around the (+Birmingham.PM) so as a parenthetical it didn't count for agreement in number and gender.
            
            Happy Holidays

            --
            Bill
            # I had a sig when sigs were cool
            use Sig;
            • Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)

              by jmm (276)

              But to be gender correct when referring to (this particular) Barbie, you would use he in place of she.