NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Stable (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you still need to take care of the bugs in RT [cpan.org] (i.e: fix them or close them) or people may conclude, like J. David did., that F-F-R is abandoned. While you're in the neighbourhood, you may wish to deal with the Kwalitee problems [perl.org].
Re:Stable (Score:1)
I deal with bugs that are mailed to me using the contact details in the AUTHOR block. If I want to use an rt queue then I can point people at it in the documentation, but you can see I haven't. That one automatically exists doesn't make it any more appealing to me, though I am grateful that the facility exists for people who do find it useful.
As to Kwalitee, I don't have the time in the day to game that system. I also don't feel that it has any direct effect on the fitness of the code, but that's a different argument.
I'm trying to be an active module author here, but when I have to cruise comments on blog posts to find out that people want me to change my code, something somewhere broke.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
The CPANTS kwalitee is not very important, I just mentioned it in the same breath. However, if you don't want people to use rt.cpan.org, then you can use a META.yml field to point them to the right URL for the correct bug tracker. (See Ack's META.yml for an example). This URL may as well be a page on your homepage (or on a wiki) that says "Email me your bugs.". And you should close the bugs there with a nice comment saying "Please email them to me". (After you've done the META.yml change).