Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • This is good advice, and reminded me of a story [cbsnews.com] I saw on 60 minutes a couple weeks ago. Apparently the health insurance company UnumProvident [unumprovident.com] instructed their claims handlers to shutdown and refuse claims to meet monthly targets. This resulted in lots of people getting shut down unfairly.
    • This practice is not entirely rare, and often not as bad as it sounds; the idea is (often) that if the claim is legitimate, the claimant will re-file, or appeal, or whatever. I am not saying it is a good thing that they do it ... but usually, the people who have legitimate claims do get them covered. I don't know if that is the case with UnumProvident or not.
      • Unfortunately, UnumProvident had targets to cut claims which didn't correspond to the amount of illigetimate claims...so the predictable result was that legitimate claims were denied. I can see your point though regarding spam: legit mailers would notice that they have been shut down and present evidence that they are not spamming...while the real spammers would guiltily accept the verdict with no questions asked.