Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Cheating for an application More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Innocent bystanders (Score:2)

by brian_d_foy (44)

This sounds like those exploits to get around the images that contain the magic word that websites want you to type in, so I blogged the story over at O'Reilly [oreillynet.com].
- Re:Innocent bystanders (Score:1)
  
  by japhy (90)
  
  I don't think buu crossed any terrible lines, like some people are accusing him of doing. That aside, I'm curious what exactly you meant in your O'Reilly post when you wrote: A poster calling himself only "BUU" I'm curious why it matters what his perlmonks nickname is. I call myself only "japhy"; what's the big deal? It sounds like you're trying to create a sinister atmosphere.
  
  --
  Jeff japhy Pinyan
  Perl, regex, and perl hacker
  - Re:Innocent bystanders (Score:2)
    
    by merlyn (47) <merlyn@stonehenge.com> on 2004.08.13 17:02 (#33371) Homepage Journal
    I believe the operative word there is only. We all know who "japhy" there is. It's you. We've met you. You make no secret of your alias. But BUU is only BUU... an anonymous poster.
    
    --
    
    Randal L. Schwartz
    
    Stonehenge
    Reply to This
    
    Parent

Get More Comments

Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.