NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I think… (Score:1)
I think the key is the “any”, and what they are trying to say is that if you start a transaction, you will only see rows as they were at the time of the transaction start, plus newer data in rows you updated since.
I think what this is tryin
Re:I think… (Score:2)
Here's the problem I have:
So the exception occurs withing a transaction.
So the exception occurs within a transaction. The anomaly occurs when several uses update the same table. How does that happen within a single transaction?
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
It doesn’t happen in a single transaction.
You see the updates you made, plus the rows you didn’t touch in whatever state they were when you started. This is within the transaction.
By the time you commit your changes, the rows you didn’t change may differ from what they were when you started the transaction. Obviously, if they differ, this must be because other users updated the table alongside your transaction.
So the particular world that you were seeing from within the transaction (