NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
NO TESTS! (Score:1)
Your argument may or may not have merit, but PDF::API2 is a terrible example to make your point.
Have you looked in the t/ directory of PDF::API2? Here, I'll save you the time:
With no unit tests, a PASS is meaningless. Only a FAIL has any meaning at all.
That said, I think PDF::API2 is good code and Fredo has been remarkably responsive in my experience, but my own not-really-competing CAM::PDF [cpan.org] library has unit tests with code coverage over 50% --
Re:NO TESTS! (Score:1)
True that, but the sheer percentage of FAILs all of which are on non-prod environments provides an excellent visual example.
Reply to This
Parent