NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I must be missing something (Score:1)
You don't like Perl 6.
You did not involve yourself in that project.
You don't like what others have done.
You have some weird ideas on how community projects work: you think that there's a cabal that controls the project. Well, you may call it a cabal, but anyone can join. You just have to write some idea in the mailing lists, or talk on the IRC channels, or submit a patch to the code or the documentation.
If you have an interest in the outcome of the project, you don't ignore it for 12 years and t
Re: (Score:1)
Shane may be entitled to rejecting my comments, but he is definitely not entitled to editing them. It may be his blog, but it's my content - and my ideas. Misrepresenting my ideas on purpose is a violent act.
I can tell you are confused. You are asking all the wrong questions. The real question is: why did we let this bunch of crazy people drive perl directly to the garbage? You don't care that it's become a joke? Interesting.
You, as member of the perl community, are also responsible for it. Take some resp
Coherent conversations (Score:1)
In your original blog post, you said that chromatic had not approved your posts.
In your comment above, you say he edited them.
You also said you wanted a coherent conversation. It sounds like, right now, you're really upset and are having problems putting one together.
If you have a beef with him, why not put together a clear, well-written post with what he did, with links to the topics.
If, on the other hand, you're just mad and want to get even for him not approving your posts, I think you should chill. No one in the community, whether they support Perl 6, Perl 5, Perl 4 or whatever, will respect your views when they're presented like this.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:1)
Shane has actually done both - rejecting and editing. Interesting how you didn't reply to any of my other comments.
As for chilling - you only want me to "chill" (I am in no way upset about this issue) because what I'm saying is somehow insulting to you -- and this is the case only because you still believe the perl mythos - speed is not important, Conway is a great programmer, Wall is smart and a linguist thus perl is awesome, Perl looks like English, Perl 6 "will be done when it's done", Perl is awesome a
Re: (Score:1)
I believe there also seems to be a larger issue: Perl developers in general are not used to discussion. We are not used to having someone question our community leaders; we are not used to discussion - we are used to incoherent "state of the onion" addresses and absolutely no accountability.
So, I understand that my comments might come as a shock, but believe me, these guys have been making a mess with what used to be a vibrant community - because we didn't follow them more closely. And every time things se