Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Kreyol pale, kreyol komprann More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Mmmmmm....no. (Score:1)

by kingubu (1882) <khampton@totalcinema.com> on 2004.10.05 6:46 (#34976) Homepage Journal

And I thought, ya know, maybe 1984 would have benefitted from just a few drops of that opaqueness that Lacan liked to smear around. To keep out the fanboys.

Piffle. Real depth is never penetrated by the fanboy gaze, so why muddy the surface?

In any case, George himself had rather different ideas [netcharles.com] about clarity of expression, so it would've been a tough sell.
-ubu

Reply to This
- Re:Mmmmmm....no. (Score:2)
  
  by TorgoX (1933)
  
  PIFFLE? KERFUFFLE!!!!
  - Re:Mmmmmm....no. (Score:1)
    
    by kingubu (1882)
    
    KERFUFFLE??? BALDERDASH!!!!!
    - Re:Mmmmmm....no. (Score:2)
      
      by pudge (1)
      
      BALDERDASH???? FLUMMERY!!!!!

Get More Comments

Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.