NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Long standing problem (Score:2)
For one-off kinds of projects, he said he'd be hesitant to hire Perl programmers to build something. Part of it is the hiring risk that your brother speaks about, but his perspective was from a risk mitigation perspective. After
Re:Long standing problem (Score:1)
It's not just managers. Far from that. There are many knowledgable people who won't touch Perl with a 10 foot pole. Very good programmers. And they are right, Perl isn't their thing.
It's not just perception. The problems people see with Perl are real. Perl is a handy tool. Multipurpose. But it's also difficult to handle, it's dangerous, and it has a lot of quircks. It's not for everyone. In fact, it's not the right language of many people currently using Perl. If I look at Perlmonks or Usenet, I'd say that more than half of the people who program in Perl shouldn't program in Perl. They'd be better off in Java.
If I compare languages with cars, Perl is like a landrover. A very useful car if that's your only car. Drives on the road and all kinds of terrain. You can put a couple of sheep in the back and take them to the vet. Or drive it to church on Sunday. Excellent car, a landrover, despite the lack of comfort and its relative low top speed. But that doesn't mean a landrover is the right car for a cab-company that has a fleet of 100 cabs. That's how I see Perl. Incredible useful language for doing all kinds of small jobs. But for large jobs, where all noses need to point in the same direction for a long time, something else, for instance Java, may be better.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Long standing problem (Score:2)
I'm certainly happy to hear well-known Perl programmers say this. This Pollyanna "Perl for everything" attitude is just as silly as the "Java-only" folks.
Re:Long standing problem (Score:1)
However, I don't think that because I think Perl is the language of choice to solve a problem, anyone else should pick Perl to solve the same problem.
Re:Long standing problem (Score:1)
I noticed that more and more discussions about the future of Perl start. I think, that Perl can get in trouble, because outstanding people have a false perception of Perl.
Why do all people compare Perl and Java? They have
Re:Long standing problem (Score:2)
The problem is that you cannot infer any general rules here. Sure, some people come to Perl from another language, and have learned the fundementals first. Others come to Perl as their first language, with or without an
Re:Long standing problem (Score:1)
My sense of Advertising is not to run to everybody and say "Perl is the Best, you shouldn't use anything else", but to show what Perl is good for. And that Perl programs can be as "clean" and "maintainable" as programs in other programming languages.
Re:Long standing problem (Score:1)
The mistake you are making here is that you assume that it's that problem that makes a language suitable. And while the problem plays some role in picking the right language, the programmer is far more important.
Re:Long standing problem (Score:2)
In fact I don't even mind that there should be another language for this kind of thing, I just wish it could be something other than Java or C#. Something more like Ruby.
Can the "why" be fixed with something other than Java/C#?