NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Packages? (Score:2)
Skype I've had much better luck with. It doesn't install anything, as I download it as a tarball and just move it to
Re:Packages? (Score:1)
This gets back to my rant on "labratory conditions". Ask any statistician about a sample size of one and what can be gleaned from it. They'll hem and haw a lot and admit that there are error margins and such for dealing with this, but they'll go on to discourage you from ever trying to use this data for anything. The "it worked for me!" people (you) are almost as obnoxious and idiotic as the "it doesn't work!" people (me). At least I, after a week of dicking with it, came to the conclusion that quality is subpar (not that none of them really work).
So, in case anyone else accidentally stumbles on your post, let me try to do some damage control here and summerize my original post (none of whose assertions you've actually challenged):
1. SIP doesn't work through NAT for a firewall.
2. Average users don't know how to open up their firewalls.
3. Corporate and mobile users usually can't open their firewalls.
4. Skype shows serious signs of amature design and the support forums back this up.
5. Linux packages (and Linux' package system) are not reliable except in labratory conditions. In the real world, there are manu failure scenarios in which they fail just as consistency as they work under other scenarios.
Let me take a moment to remind everyone that software sucks [we-hates-software.com], no matter what software it is. Even Linux. Remember mutt's motto: "mutt sucks. It just sucks less than other mail readers".
-scott
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Packages? (Score:2)
Re:Packages? (Score:1)
-scott