NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
just ask her to call bullshit (Score:2)
How about a few questions like.. "So for the last library you wrote, did it have documentation coverage tests, and hundreds of unit tests.. because it's the norm in perl development these days"..
or "so when was the last time you went to any talks on your enterprise language of choice, or discussed best practice with the local user group. So whens the next UK conference for $uk_language and are you going?"
Hopefully you
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Re:just ask her to call bullshit (Score:1)
hiring smarter people than you (Score:2)
I've been looking for an additional contractor recently and would have been very happy to take on somebody with better perl and integration skills. My job as lead tech has always been to understand the business and build a partnership with the project manager and generally set out how things should be done. If we have somebody who knows better than me, we're more likely to avoid so
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
clever people (Score:2)
Avoid anybody described as a genius..
Of the places I've worked with a 'genius'..
2/3 times they have had a non-cs background and reinvented every wheel from cgi query parsing to templating to database abstraction, and usually have very odd ideas about how to organise and name things.
1/3 the genius had a CS background but still insisted that he could reinvent a better wheel than mod_perl, TT, etc.. yes mugwump I'm looking at your smart arse
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Success Stories (Score:2)
Perhaps you could get her to mention that.
Re:Success Stories (Score:1)
Hard to read = "Only if you don't comment your code and don't write documentation, but then only bad programmers don't comment or document their code"
The job security thing is also a myth, anyone that thinks so deserves to be fired.
More perl in aviation (Score:2)
So much for the old "perl isn't fit for mission critical software" - our briefing system meant that one of our customers was the only european airline able to get it's customers to their destination for a couple of days last christmas, all the others had their customers stranded at airports.
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Re:Success Stories (Score:1)
I guess you _could_ assume that the site just creaks along on badly written perl, without seeing the code you wouldn't know it's all Object Oriented, with thousands of tests, optimized caching (both on disk and using memcache), documented and reviewed by another developer before going live, all automatically deployed on multiple servers using an automated packaging syst
All of those statements can be and often are, true (Score:2)
Re:All of those statements can be and often are, t (Score:2)
If they said that they'd lose productivity and have to learn a new language, which are valid reasons then nobody would be complaining.
The problem is they are spouting bullshit about something they have no knowledge of.
@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
Some general points (Score:1)
http://www.perl.org/advocacy/ [perl.org]
http://www.perl.org/advocacy/whyperl.html [perl.org]
Or just send them the link.