NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)
2000 [pm.org], 2001 [pm.org], 2002 [pm.org], 2003 [pm.org], 2004 [pm.org], 2005 [pm.org] and 2006 [pm.org].
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)
And our rather noisy Boston [pm.org] mailing list is shown as having 300 members and 0 posts per day. (And doesn't mention sometimes-social meetings.)
No poll / census is a perfect reflection of reallity -- the Map is not the territory.
But yes, it is funny that the last two YAPC::EU's have been run by groups with (reportedly) no members.
(-: Is this a sign that Barbie+Birmingham.PM should make some (read all) members redundant quickly,
Bill
# I had a sig when sigs were cool
use Sig;
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)
Er... is that "she" refering to Barbie or to Birmingham? O:-)
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:1)
Happy Holidays
Bill
# I had a sig when sigs were cool
use Sig;
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)
Re:Why Stop at Two? (Score:2)
Well actually it says that those groups have mailing lists with no members. Which isn't quite the same as saying that the groups have no members. But obviously a mailing list with no members seems a little pointless and you'd generally expect most of the group members to be on the mailing list.
I deliberately didn't ask the group leaders how many actual members they had. Largely because from experiences with london.pm I know what a tricky concept membership can be