NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Not as simple as you think (Score:1)
Are you mad at the people of New Orleans for staying in the path of disaster? Then you should also be mad at the people of San Francisco for living on top of a fault line, and the people of New York for living so close to an obvious terrorist target.
Are you considering that the people who could have afforded to get out had already done so? That some of the people who were caught in the disaster may have done so by choice (some who decided to stick around for whatever odd reason), but that a great number
Re:Not as simple as you think (Score:2)
Were that I say, pancakes?
Re:Not as simple as you think (Score:1)
I am sorry, but this is just not true. In all likelyness, the "poor" probably cannot flee at any moment, no matter how much warning they are given.
When you are poor, when your family is poor, when you parents are poor, when poverty goes back generations in your family, you do not have the same choices as people who are more well off might have. You cannot just pick up and move to some other place. If all the money you have goes towards putting food on the table, where are you going to get the money to move to another city/town/state? Moving costs money, and moving a family cost's even more money. And it is not so simple to just get up and leave an entire support network of friends and family and move.
Do not for one second think that most of the people left behind made the choice to do so. Many of those people just did not have the means (read: money) to make any choice.
- Stevan
Reply to This
Parent