NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Ruby is great, but... (Score:1)
Buck
Reply to This
Re:Ruby is great, but... (Score:2)
Perhaps it depends upon how you wrote the program? From what was presented at the presentation, Ruby tends to be about 3% slower than Perl (whatever that means). If your program is running three times longer, I suspect that it's somehow due to the structure of the program. (unless, of course, there's something really funky about Ruby regexen that I am unaware of).
Re:Ruby is great, but... (Score:2)
You're right, though. Perl is slightly faster than Ruby in most cases. This has mostly to do with interpreter startup time, but I think the Perl Development team also has simply had more time to tweak the C code. This is the sort of thing that will improve over time.
Patches welcome. :)
Re:Ruby is great, but... (Score:1)
Yes, that damned Perl Development team. They've done such a bloody good job of tweaking stuff already that I'm finding it very hard to get perl to go any faster. And the parrot folks are even worse - they're trying to get it fast as they design it, so that us retrofit tinkerers can't even squeeze any more out of it. :-(
Re:Ruby is great, but... (Score:1)
Re:Ruby is great, but... (Score:1)
Posted it all here [perl.org] for everybody's perusal. I expected Perl to be faster, but not by 3:1. I really hope it is something wrong on my part; I like Ruby a lot.
Thanks,
Buck