Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • One thing which I think could be better done in the Parse::RecDescent FAQ is the attribution or reference of sources so that, in the instance where questions have been directly taken from other sources, readers have the opportunity to follow through back with the original source for further discussions.

    I found this element lacking after I found one such question which I asked on Perlmonks included verbatim in the FAQ with attribution or reference - Whilst I don't have any problem in the least with the lack of attribution, I think it would have been nice for a link back to the original thread on Perlmonks for further reading.

    • I think you are right about referencing things and there certainly could be an issue with giving credit where credit is due. If you have any patches to the FAQ I am glad to add them.