NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
use 5.012 (Score:1)
It already does "use feature '5.011';". And it was hard to add even "use strict" - too much opposition. "use warnings" would have even more.
Sorry, no (Score:1)
Strongly disagree with IO::Handle and
warnings. Strictures are important, warnings are not (note that I almost always enable them).Would like
no indirect, but I doubt it’ll happen.Not opposed to C3, but indifferent.
Re: (Score:1)
What's wrong with
IO::Handle? 5.6 could have supported calling methods on lexical filehandles without loadingIO::Handleexplicitly without violating the Principle of Least Surprise. (I could argue that having an object you can't actually call methods on violates PoLS.)use warnings FATAL => 'all'; (Score:1)
I've been doing this for years in code without any problems, so I think it's a good candidate if strictures are going to be enabled.