use Perl

• typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe issue (Score:1)

  by hughescr (4711)

  You've got "spam" instead of "spamc" as the command line name in a bunch of places. Plus, no need to lock while running spamc in your procmail recipe. spamc can have many parallel instances without any problems. If you want to limit the number of child processes spamd starts, you can do that with the -m option to spamd on startup -- any "extra" spamc's will simply wait until a spamd become available.
  • Re:typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe iss (Score:2)

    by 2shortplanks (968)

    Thanks for spotting that. I think I accidentally did that in the spell checker

    You're right about the spamc thing, I should probably let all the spamc's do their work.
    • Re:typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe iss (Score:1)

      by hughescr (4711) on 2003.12.09 13:41 (#26390)

      Well, I wrote spamc/spamd -- and I would recommend letting them all work ;)

      Reply to This

      Parent

      • Re:typos in the spamc section, procmail recipe iss (Score:1)

        by drhyde (1683)

        And thank *you* for doing all the work :-)