use Perl

• bogofilter (Score:1)

  by inkdroid (3294)

  Yeah, I think this highlights why bayesian analysis is better than rule based approaches. It's harder to tweak the message so it slips by. Also, it's my understanding that bogofilter can scaled much better on a high volume MTA than SpamAssasin...but I don't know this for a fact so perhaps I should keep quiet.
  • Re:bogofilter (Score:2)

    by Matts (1087)

    No it's true. SpamAssassin's rules are slow.
    
    On the flip side, bogofilter is a personal filter, so it's not going to perform that well on larger installations, which kind of breaks the point of being so much faster, doesn't it?
    • Re:bogofilter (Score:1)

      by inkdroid (3294)

      bogofilter can be run from procmail or invoked by your mta just like spamassasin. It just needs a nice corpus of spam/non-spam. What do you mean by being a "personal filter"?
      • Re:bogofilter (Score:1)

        by chromatic (983) on 2003.02.04 13:04 (#16700) Homepage Journal

        Being a Bayesian filter, it assumes there's a clear line between spam and non-spam. The more people you put in the same filter, the fuzzier that line may get. It's attempting to emulate your personal in-your-head filter.

        Reply to This

        Parent

        • Re:bogofilter (Score:1)

          by inkdroid (3294)

          Yeah, but everyone gets their own.
          • Re:bogofilter (Score:1)

            by chromatic (983)

            Hence the phrase "personal filter". :)