Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Ignorance from Princeton. More | Login | Reply

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Very Good Points - This happens too often (Score:2)

by TeeJay (2309)

This is the second time I've heard of supposedly serious journals dismissing free software or perl in such an underhanded way.
It is safe to say that all the major Free Software projects have very good version control, testing and QA.
The Apache group is probably the best example of well managed code and organised people - they have produced standards defining code that frequently shames the big names of IT like Microsoft or IBM.
It is obvious this fool has never even looked at open source code
Even the

--

@JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
print reverse @JAPH;
- Re:Very Good Points - This happens too often (Score:2)
  
  by TeeJay (2309) on 2003.11.06 5:04 (#25520) Homepage Journal
  
  I noticed he doesn't even cite anything to justify his claims - such as available code be discredited.
  what a prize muppet
  
  --
  
  @JAPH = qw(Hacker Perl Another Just);
  print reverse @JAPH;
  
  Reply to This
  
  Parent

Get More Comments

Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.