Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • So we either get a useful new language, or we get a Paul Graham with better insight on his areas of fallibility and (hopefully) greater humility and less of a tendency to make bold untestable statements.

    Doubt it. It seemed to me that he was full of himself, or had a lot of time on his hands, because he made a million dollars a few years ago.

    • So we either get a useful new language, or we get a Paul Graham with better insight on his areas of fallibility and (hopefully) greater humility and less of a tendency to make bold untestable statements.

      Doubt it. It seemed to me that he was full of himself, or had a lot of time on his hands, because he made a million dollars a few years ago.

      > It seemed to me that he was full of himself, or had a lot of time on his hands, because he made a million dollars a few years ago.

      That gives him some leeway to talk about making a million dollars, but then he's only done it once as far as I'm aware (could be wrong).

      If he can predict (invest) in a new startup and get it right again, then I get impressed.

      I still think it doesn't qualify him to talk about analogies between hackers and painters (unless he's a painter too, which he may well be).