NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I use(d) CVS and I use Git, and Git is much easier (Score:1)
I used both CVS and Git, and with possible exception of ad-hoc version control of loosely coupled files, Git is much, much easier to use. Branching and especially merging branches in CVS is deep, dark magic; in Git it is extremly easy.
See also my answer to Difference between GIT and CVS [stackoverflow.com] question on StackOverflow (community Q&A site).
Some of those transfer to comparison between Subversion and Git: see For home projects, can Git (or other DVCS) provide advantage over Subversion? [stackoverflow.com] also on StackOverf
Re:I use(d) CVS and I use Git, and Git is much eas (Score:1)
Git is, unfortunately, a lot harder for me.
But that's not the issue, it's whether or not it makes better for other people, and if that subsequently means they commit more code without me needing to be involved.
Reply to This
Parent