Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • It's called "bluffing", and it's the sort of threat it takes to get Hussein's attention. Do you really think he's gonna drop a nuke on Iraq? Hell no.

    Perhaps you prefer the Bill Clinton approach of telling everyone what you're NOT willing to do, or that you're almost out of cruise missiles. Pure genius, that one.

    • by jjohn (22) on 2002.03.14 21:40 (#5948) Homepage Journal

      Get Saddham's attention? Are you serious? We've got troops engaged in a shooting war on his back porch. The US and UK have dropped not so subtle hints about bitch slapping Iraq again. It is unreasonable to think that Saddham has forgotten that world's largest nuclear stockpile belongs to the US. Saddham is playing a different political game than just grabbing land and I don't think the US public has the whole story on this.

      Nukes are stupid. The environmental damage even from small warheads will affect the US. Remember a few months ago, there was a Texas-sized dust cloud the flew over the Pacific and affected the US? Would that that had been irradiated dust. Making a threat you're not willing to back up is very, very dangerous.

      The other way of deterring attacks by foreign powers is by being a good neighbor. You know: following internation pollution control initiatives like the Kyoto Protocols, paying the UN our back dues, not making sanctimonious condemnations of China's human rights violations while maintaining Camp X-Ray.

      While I'm not suggesting the world is a happy-fun place with bright shiny people, I am saying that US foreign policy, particularly under George W., has done more to antagonize the world community than the past two administrations (Reagan was an ass, but Bush's dad wasn't so bad).

      • It is unreasonable to think that Saddham has forgotten that world's largest nuclear stockpile belongs to the US

        It's not a question of knowing or forgetting. He knew it in '90 and he knows it now. He just doesn't *care*.

        Nukes are stupid. The environmental damage even from small warheads will affect the US.

        The whole world *knows* that. In the case of Iraq, they're hardly necessary either. Hell, I was mad when I found out we were using uranium depleted shells against them, which ended up irradiating

      • 1. If anything, the UN owes the US money, because of all the unreimbursed billions the US has spent on behalf of the UN. I am not saying the US should demand such payment, but the money is not actually owed by the US government to the UN. In fact, the UN has no power to compel payment, so the money cannot be "owed" to the UN.

        2. The Kyoto Protocols are lame. Condoning them would be be bad. Condoning something bad is not being good to anyone, least of all your neighbors.

        3. You have a problem with CAMP X