Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Hm, the last time I counted dists (excluding Bundles..) on CPAN I got 10535. I wonder what's causing the difference...

  • Simulation-Sensitivity [cpan.org] has entered CPAN (and should soon be up on search.cpan.org).

    It's been sitting around unreleased for over a year. Doesn't do much, but what it does it does just fine.

  • I agree the 10000 modules is an impressive count. But wouldn't it be a worthier goal to decrease the number of modules? I guess that there are a lot of redundant and abandoned modules on CPAN.

    On the other hand, I'm wondering about refaktoring. Does refaktoring tend to increase the number of modules, as large chunks of code are broken up into smaller pieces? Or does it decrease the number of modules, as cut&past code is unified?

    --
    /* Bernhard.Schmalhofer@gmx.de */
    • There are some redundant modules, and some adandoned ones.

      I've personally deleted 2 in the last 3 months. One was just an idea that had since been solved a different way, and the other was a bad mistake that never even ran.

      But why delete anything?

      If something is abandoned, who's to say it isn't still in use?

      We get people emailing the modules@ mailing list asking to take over modules about once a week or so.

      And if something is redundant, should we abandon all the current users?

      Some things get deprecated, but
  • I uploaded Test-Run-Plugin-FailSummaryComponents, and will hopefully upload its CmdLine equivalent soon.

    .
    • Replying to myself, I'd like to add that I uploaded CGI-Application-NetNewsIface [cpan.org] version 0.0101 (its first non-developer release) as I don't know whether your count excludes modules that only have developer releases.

      It would be a good idea to mention whether this is the case: does the number of CPAN distributions that you mention includes CPAN distrs that only have had developer releases (i.e: with versions that contain underscores) so far?

      • I honesty have no idea whatsoever, I'm simply going off the "headline" number on the front page of cpan.org.

        With any set of modules as bit CPAN, the "number" of them is going to become inherently fuzzy, depending on how you measure it.

        So I go with the headline quantity, which apparently doesn't QUITE match the total number of distros, as mentioned by someone earlier.
  • According to The CPAN Front Page [cpan.org]:

    3045 MB 283 mirrors 5107 authors 10006 modules

    Thanks to all the uploaders!

    BTW, it is interesting that the average number of moduless per author is slightly below 2.

    • Higher actually, only about 3500 have ever uploaded.

      The rest, well I can only assume there's people that want it for other systems, or they never get around to uploading, and so on.

      The average is just less than 2.