NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
I wouldn't hire them (Score:1)
I think anyone that has really done that much coding wouldn't make that mistake. (If they made that mistake on a resume... they aren't detail oriented enough for me.)
*shrug* (Score:1)
I've used most of those (PeopleTools, I don't know), but I definitely wouldn't put them on a resume; because I don't think I know enough.
Is that person implying frequent use or familiarity ? Passing "I've seen what this looks like, read some code, fiddled with it" type answers are certainly possible.. Developer level, I-dont-need-no-stinking-reference-manual type knowledge.. ? umm, wow.
Re:*shrug* (Score:1)
That's why I extend linguistical concepts to my resumé, based on my (perceived) ability to read (understand) and write (produce) some technology: fluent, literate, conversant, and familiar.
Most interviewers have commented favorably on that approach, although I have had to explain it more often than not.
Re:*shrug* (Score:2)
Re:*shrug* (Score:2)
Just mark that down as "fluent", just like the next guy.
I'm with phillup (Score:2)
Re:I'm with phillup (Score:2)
The real shock to me is that somebody would claim that they had working knowledge of so many disparate technologies.
Re:I'm with phillup (Score:2)