NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
Circus (Score:1)
And what's funny is that if the vote were held today, Arnold would win and he has no more experience than Gary.
Re:Circus (Score:2)
Saying it is a "handful of extremely wealthy Republicans"
Re:Circus (Score:2)
Actually quite a lot of people are calling it a circus not just Jamie. Yesterday's Arizona Republic Headline "Hurry, step right up! It's California's circus'. The fact that California wanted it this way is completely irrelevant and doesn't mean that people shouldn't comment on how
Re:Circus (Score:2)
I never contended or implied otherwise.
Yesterday's Arizona Republic Headline "Hurry, step right up! It's California's circus'. The fact that California wanted it this way is completely irrelevant
Irrelevant to what? Whether it is a circus? I already said this, that it may be a circus, but that whether it is a circus is unimportant to the reality of the situation.
and doesn't mean that people shouldn't comment on how ridiculous the whole thing is turning out.
I think if you aren't in California, then it's none of your business. This is how they want it. Why should anyone else care? I don't understand. People are far too interested in other people's business.
Yes but didn't Darrell Issa put up 2 million of his own money to get the recall ball rolling? I wonder if there would have actually been a recall without his money?
Maybe not
So we can't comment on things we don't agree with?
I never said you couldn't. What I am saying is that I don't see why you should even CARE. It has nothing whatever to do with you. It is not illegal, it is not unfair, it is not undemocratic. It is the will of the people of California, where you don't live.
But hey, if you want to do something so unproductive as to complain about how the people of the state of California choose to select their leaders -- when that method is absolutely legal and Constitutional -- go ahead. It just seems so utterly pointless. It's not like the people of California care what outsiders think; it's not like they need the help of outsiders in changing things; it's not like what you say or think will have any effect on the situation whatsoever.
I just think that if you are going to have opinions on things, it should be about things that you have some actual interest in: maybe it affects you; maybe you can effect change; maybe it is giving voice to people who have none. Do as you wish, but I generally prefer to not have opinions about the internal issues of other peoples, where there are no legal or moral issues at stake.
Reply to This
Parent