NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
ever try buying an o'reilly book in smolensk? :) (Score:2)
If you are against copyright and the RIAA then how are books different or exempt from this? It's a curiosity for me since the scope of copyright seems to elude many who support free distribution of music and movies but get upset at other forms of piracy...like books.
Re:ever try buying an o'reilly book in smolensk? : (Score:2)
We've had this discussion before. My position remains that I only ever have electronic copies of music that I have purchased. And I don't download films to watch on my computer.
As far as I'm concerned, a person who creates a copyrightable work gets to choose the license that it's distributed under and I will not break that license.
I agree, however, that it's a dilemma that needs to be addressed by people who support some forms of copyright, but not others.
Re:ever try buying an o'reilly book in smolensk? : (Score:2)
Indeed. Copyright is a deep dark hole that I don't much care to inhabit and books are in a sort of grey area. Few seem to mention books in the music hububb yet books have even more restrictive copyrights than music does. Until we live in a utopian society I'm happy to buy books and music and tell my friends to do the same.
I have made pdf's of the camel and cookbook that I keep on my laptop which technically violates the copyright agreement but I think I can live with that :)
Reply to This
Parent