NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.

use Perl

All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Wow! (Score:1)

by xsawyerx (8978)

Now that's freaking awesome!
- it's not (Score:1)
  
  by daxim (8218)
  
  I hope you are excited at the potential of the design proposal and not as it is now, because the kerning's off and the l's ascender has been artificially elongated way over its original height, resulting in bad typography for the important centrepiece.
  I agree with kentnl's own assessment, but at least that's easily fixable. Kudos for bringing this idea into first concrete form!
  - Re: (Score:1)
    
    by xsawyerx (8978)
    
    Well, yes. Not as is. Surely it is just a concept and requires change, but as you said, the potential is what excites me :)
  - Re:it’s not (Score:1)
    
    by Aristotle (5147)
    
    I hope you read the last sentence of his post? :-)
Disagree (Score:2)

by vek (2312)

Oh no, that's not suck. That's really really good actually. Really good.
I don't get it (Score:1)

by Alias (5735)

What am I looking at... some weirdly shaped triangles with legs?
- Re:I don’t get it (Score:1)
  
  by Aristotle (5147)
  
  Butterflies seen from the side, one landed on the logotype, one flying.
  Took me a moment too.
That is actually quite pretty... (Score:2)

by bart (450)

But I don't get it, why does it have to be a butterfly? Does it have a special meaning, or is it merely pretty?
As you can see [perl.org], people are already fighting over the use of the butterfly as a logo.
Why not, for example, a shrimp?