NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
She's not your agent (Score:2)
Reply to This
Re:She's not your agent (Score:1)
Please note that this reply was granted as matter of answering your question and does not constitute an offer to engage you in conversation about the article, debate the accuracy of any statements therein, or defend the questionable validity of it. That it's of dubious validity and accuracy I thought was clear and better left unspoken. Now, if you have any *insights* with which you can *add* to what I've written, rather than threating me w
Re:She's not your agent (Score:1)
Ahh, they usually don't work "for" either one. They often work for themselves, or an agency, or for the fee/commission they'll receive. Sure, if the company hires the candidate and pays the fee, you can argue that the recruiter was working for the company, but if the company doesn't hire the candidate, then the recruiter was working for nada.