NOTE: use Perl; is on undef hiatus. You can read content, but you can't post it. More info will be forthcoming forthcomingly.
All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report
Stories, comments, journals, and other submissions on use Perl; are Copyright 1998-2006, their respective owners.
How does PROPERL improve on Enlightened Perl? (Score:2)
If Enlightened Perl is close, where does it go wrong, where PROPERL goes right? It's not clear from your explanation/manifesto.
Re: (Score:1)
Task::Kensho no good? (Score:1)
[EPO] don't go as far as fixing their efforts to a completely "definable" toolset
I thought they did. Isn't that what Task::Kensho is?
Perl is Alive
http://perlisalive.com [perlisalive.com]
Re:Task::Kensho no good? (Score:1)
Thanks for pointing this out to me, Denny. Just read up on Task::Kensho
Maybe there is a big overlap after all. Meanwhile, Matt Trout contacted me about PROPERL & EPO and suggested we work together on this instead of going both our seperate ways. Am considering to accept his offer.
-chrisv
Reply to This
Parent